A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF REMUNERATION ON EMPLOYEE PRODUCTIVITY: A CASE STUDY OF LECTURERS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF DOUALA

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the Study The performance of employees plays a fundamental role in determining the overall success of any organization (Surbhi, 2015). Essentially, employee performance refers to the measure of an individual’s productivity within the workplace, which is typically assessed by the quantity of acceptable-quality outputs delivered over a specific time period. When hiring employees, organizations primarily expect them to perform efficiently in exchange for agreed compensation (Ojeleye & Okoro, 2016). Globally, many organizations incorporate a range of payment structures and benefits into their remuneration systems. These packages are designed to motivate employees and are central to the modern human resource management strategies employed by various companies. For instance, in the United Kingdom, many employees in both private companies and other sectors receive diverse financial and non-financial incentives. These might include employee discounts, partially employer-funded pension schemes, and other welfare benefits (Qureshi & Sajjad, 2015). However, in Africa, employee remuneration remains a persistent challenge, particularly in the public sector. Many public institutions provide insufficient compensation, leading to poor job satisfaction, strained workplace relationships, and reduced productivity. Consequently, service delivery in such organizations has been negatively affected (Heathfield, 2016). Inadequate pay structures, characterized by low salaries and wages, often lead to poor morale, high staff turnover, and low productivity—factors that collectively hinder organizational performance (Heathfield, 2016). In Cameroon, similar issues are evident, especially within the public sector. There has been a noticeable decline in employee productivity and a significant increase in staff resignations, largely attributed to dissatisfaction with existing remuneration practices. Additionally, industrial strikes have become more frequent, particularly in the health, education, and mining sectors, further undermining service delivery (Kell, Vance & Webb, 2015). These strikes are often driven by frustration over poor remuneration and a desire to seek better-paying jobs abroad. With the cost of living steadily rising in recent years, organizations have come under pressure to adjust wages, salaries, incentive plans, and fringe benefits to match inflation. This also necessitates updating compensation structures to align more closely with employee performance. Remuneration must therefore be viewed as a strategic tool to attract, motivate, and retain talent, thereby enhancing overall productivity (Kell, Vance & Webb, 2015). A robust and diversified compensation strategy not only gives organizations an edge in a competitive labor market but also boosts their reputation. Supporting this view, Heathfield (2016) emphasized that a fair and well-structured compensation system enhances an organization’s image, strengthens employer-employee relations, improves employee commitment, and minimizes recruitment costs due to higher retention rates. All of these factors contribute significantly to achieving organizational goals. Based on this context, the researcher aims to investigate the impact of remuneration on employee productivity, using lecturers at the University of Douala as a case study. 1.2 Statement of the Problem Employee productivity is a crucial factor influencing organizational growth and sustainability, especially in today’s highly competitive business world. Among the numerous factors that affect productivity, remuneration stands out as particularly significant. Compensation—whether in the form of financial rewards, benefits, or incentives—not only helps attract and retain skilled personnel but also influences their motivation and output. Understanding how remuneration directly and indirectly affects productivity is essential for improving workforce management practices. Various scholars, such as Akter & Moazzam (2016), have explored this relationship with mixed findings. Some researchers suggest that better compensation leads to increased motivation and productivity (Ajalie, 2017; Beyza, 2018). Others, however, believe the connection is more nuanced, influenced by factors like perceived fairness, organizational culture, and job satisfaction (Surbhi, 2015; Heathfield, 2016; Ajalie, 2017). The evolving nature of the employment sector has introduced new pay models, such as performance-based pay, profit-sharing schemes, and non-monetary incentives. These innovations raise questions about their actual impact on productivity compared to traditional fixed-salary structures. It’s also vital to examine the role of non-financial motivators—such as recognition programs and flexible work options—in driving employee performance. Additionally, remuneration influences not only individual employee output but also broader organizational dynamics. For instance, inconsistent or unfair pay structures can create discontent and lower overall productivity (Karia & Omari, 2015). An organization’s ability to compete for top talent and maintain a skilled workforce often hinges on how well its compensation practices align with industry standards. Given these issues, this study seeks to examine how remuneration impacts worker productivity, focusing specifically on lecturers at the University of Douala. 1.3 Objective of the Study The general objective of this study is to assess how remuneration influences the productivity of workers, specifically among lecturers at the University of Douala. The specific objectives include: i. To identify the different forms of remuneration implemented at the University of Douala. ii. To evaluate how remuneration affects worker productivity at the University of Douala. iii. To examine the impact of inadequate remuneration on employee performance. iv. To explore the relationship between remuneration and overall worker productivity at the University of Douala. 1.4 Research Questions The following research questions will guide this study: i. What types of remuneration are used at the University of Douala? ii. To what extent does remuneration influence employee productivity at the University of Douala? iii. How does poor remuneration affect the performance of employees at the University of Douala? iv. Is there a relationship between remuneration and employee productivity at the University of Douala? 1.5 Significance of the Study This study’s findings will provide valuable insights for human resource management by highlighting the importance of performance-based pay systems in boosting employee motivation and output. Business organizations will benefit from the study as it offers guidance on formulating effective compensation policies that enhance employee productivity. Additionally, the Ministry of Labour may use the results to better understand employee working conditions across organizations, which can help in policy development and workforce regulation. Academically, the research will enrich the body of literature on employee remuneration and productivity. It will also serve as a useful resource for future researchers looking to explore related themes or build upon this study. 1.6 Scope of the Study This research focuses on the effect of remuneration on employee productivity, using lecturers at the University of Douala as a case study. The study will specifically assess the forms of remuneration adopted, the extent to which remuneration influences productivity, the consequences of poor compensation, and the general relationship between pay and performance. Geographically, the research is confined to lecturers working at the University of Douala. 1.7 Limitations of the Study As with many research efforts, this study faced a few challenges. Limited financial resources hindered the researcher’s ability to source relevant materials and literature and constrained the data collection process (via internet access, interviews, and questionnaires). Due to budgetary limits, a modest sample size was adopted. Moreover, the researcher had to balance this project with other academic commitments, which reduced the amount of time that could be dedicated solely to the research process. 1.8 Definition of Terms Remuneration: The full package of compensation provided to employees in return for their services. This includes direct monetary payments such as salaries, bonuses, and commissions, as well as benefits like health insurance, pension plans, and paid leave. Productivity: A metric that reflects how efficiently resources (like labor and capital) are transformed into outputs. Productivity is often measured by output per unit of input or per hour worked. Performance-Based Pay: A compensation strategy where employees receive bonuses or raises based on how well they meet or exceed set performance goals. Non-Monetary Incentives: Benefits offered to employees that do not involve cash payments, such as recognition programs, flexible work hours, career development opportunities, and initiatives that promote work-life balance. REFERENCES Ajalie, S. N. (2017). Effect of employee motivation on organizational productivity. unpulished thesis, 1-127. Akter, N., & Moazzam, H. (2016). Effect of compensation on job performance: An empirical study. International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Science. 4(8), 10-15. Beyza, S. (2018). Minimum wage as an ethical issue. European Journal of Multidiciplinary Studies. 3(1), 26- 35. Heathfield, S. M. (2016). Bonus Pay. Retrieved on 24th August, 2016 from https://www.thebalance.com/what-is-bonuspay-1918069. Karia, A. O., & Omari, S. (2015). Importance of compensation and benefits on performance of public water utilities in Tanzania. African Journal of Business and Management, 1(1), 1-5. Kell, K., Vance, T. W. and Webb, A. (2015). The interactive effects of goal difficulty and subjectivity on performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 27(1): 1 – 25. Ojeleye, Y.C & Okoro, C.I. (2016). Job stress and employees’ productivity in telecommunication sector of Nigeria (A study of Globacom, MTN, Airtel and Etisalat). International Journal of Multidisciplinary Education and Research.1(5): 5-10. Qureshi, M O. & Sajjad, S.R. (2015). An empirical analysis of the impact of compensation on job performance and work-family conflict in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia- a correlation model. European Scientific Journal, 11(4), 1857- 7881. Surbhi, S. (2015). Differences between Salaries and Wages. Wael, S. Z., & Farouk, S. (2017). The impact of financial reward on job satisfaction and performance Implications for blue collar employees. China-USA Business Review, 16(8), 367-378.